Silvio Scalia, a former govt assistant to trend modeling, has turn out to be disgusted along with his makes an attempt to discredit his spouse, Actuality star and CEO Julia Hartwithin the court docket that testified towards him, based on court docket papers.
Whistleblower Tanya Cohen said in a sworn assertion that Scalia was intent on “destroying [an] an harmless girl”, and that he had Cohen’s firm accounts to seek for any hint of shady dealings by the “My Unconventional Life” star – however discovered none.
In actual fact, Cohen says within the court docket submitting, all she found was proof that Scalia himself was utilizing the corporate’s accounts to buy costly presents for his new fiancée And pay for lavish holidays.
Scalia and Hart married in 2019, and he appointed her as CEO of his mannequin administration enterprise Elite World Group. However he claims “amaze her” By firing her on the identical day in February 2022 that she filed for divorce.
Since then, the businessman has claimed in court docket paperwork that Hart misused firm funds, and even “stolen” a Bentley.
However Cohen says within the papers that the luxurious automotive was honest and sq. to Haart, and that Scalia knew it when he made his stunning claims.
She even says Scalia simply tried The automotive wrench away from her as a result of he knew she liked it and “wished it”.
In a sworn affidavit filed this month in New York Supreme Courtroom by Hart’s highly effective legal professional Lani Davis, Cohen stated: “I am coming ahead as a result of after realizing that Mr. Scalia was not trustworthy, whereas making an attempt to destroy an harmless girl (Ms. Hart), I felt he It was the best factor to return ahead and inform the reality.”
Cohen — who labored for the modeling firm, Elite World Group, from January 2022, a month after Haart filed for divorce, till final month — stated Scaglia had been “partaking in extreme spending of EWG funds for his personal private use,” and he had “frequently tried to color an image Hart as a villain who misused firm funds and induced monetary turmoil at EWG.”
She stated Scalia gave her the job of sifting by the corporate’s information “to attempt to discover any cash Ms. Hart had taken illegally.”
“I spent a number of months wanting by emails, paperwork, financial institution statements and bank cards, solely to seek out that not a single greenback had been taken inappropriately by Ms. Hart,” she stated, including, “All of Ms. Hart’s bills had been clear and available to me to sum it up.”
Within the affidavit, she stated that though Scalia was largely uninvolved in operating the corporate and was a “clean go well with,” he used firm cash to buy a $342,000 engagement ring for his new fiancée, and spent $132,000 on renting a luxurious yacht. in Tahiti, plus $16,000 for enterprise class flights to the island of Polynesia for the couple. She additionally stated that he had put aside $400,000 for a luxurious yacht cruise in Italy.
In the meantime, she stated that whereas Scalia had publicly accused Hart, a former ultra-Orthodox Jew who left the neighborhood and have become a high-powered enterprise govt, of stealing a Bentley, he knew the automotive belonged to her all alongside.
She stated the automotive was rented from a dealership, SW Sacristy Vehicles, which is collectively owned by each Haart and Scaglia, and that she had “found paperwork displaying that…. Haart’s private Vary Rover SV Autobiography” which was valued at US$112,000.
“I additionally discovered that after Mr. Scalia ended Ms. Hart’s place as CEO of EWG, Ms. Haart tried to proceed making lease funds on the Bentley on her personal,” it stated within the submitting. “Solely as a result of the lease was within the title of SW Sacristy Vehicles, LLC and never in Ms. Haart’s title personally, was Mr. Scaglia in a position to terminate the lease and return the automotive to the Bentley dealership regardless of Ms. Haart’s try to proceed to make lease funds personally.”
She stated he requested SW Sacristy Vehicles to cancel the lease “solely out of a grudge as a result of he knew and expressed to me that Mrs. Haart had a powerful private attachment to Bentley and wished to punish/hurt her by having the automotive taken away from her.”