Cruz called Trump’s fraud allegations “reckless”. Now he promises his own testimony.


Suspension

Among the many Republicans who walked a fine line over Donald Trump’s allegations of vote fraud after 2020 electionPerhaps no one has walked better than Senator Ted Cruz (Texas).

he is I offered to discuss the Trump case Before the Supreme Court, even Led the fateful challenge With the election results, during the congressional approval of Biden’s victory, which preceded January 6 insurgency. All the while, though, Cruz—like many—avoided engaging in detail on actual evidence of the alleged fraud. Instead, he put his efforts into a question-only style that nurtures unfounded doubts while allowing for some plausible denial.

And when the whole thing blew up on January 6, Cruz exercised this denial: He called Trump’s allegations of voter fraud. ‘Reckless’, ‘irresponsible’, ‘too out of line’ – despite offering to discuss Trump’s case – and even Trump said,It’s clear that he bears some responsibilityBecause of his ‘angry speech’.

Cruz has since backed away from that stance, like almost anyone in his party who dared criticize Trump after that infamous day. And now he’s coming out with a book this week that’s promoting it as “the first internal report on what happened on January 6th.”

Among the focal points of the book, according to Cruz’s interview on Fox News Sunday night? “I show them evidence of election fraud and voter fraud in November 2020, which Democrats and the institutional media insist does not exist,” Cruz said.

The resulting text should be very expressive – both when it comes to the lack of actual evidence and for Cruz’s and the all-too-comfortable post-January GOP. 6 conversion.

To be clear, despite the sharp criticism of Trump after January 6, Cruz has continued to stick to the idea of ​​massive voter fraud, even if Trump’s own allegations are bogus. It is at least theoretically possible to provide a thoughtful review of the evidence, as it exists.

It seems more likely that Cruz will provide enough smoke for the many Republicans who still have unfounded doubts about the legitimacy of the 2020 election. That is the price of importance in the Republican Party today, and Cruz has shown he is more than willing to pay.

When Cruz rallied nearly a dozen Republican senators to veto the January 6 election results, the wording of their statement He was very careful. did not mention real guide Fraud instead cited the allegations And the Knowledge And the need to reassure people.

She referred to “unprecedented allegations of voter fraud.” “The allegations of fraud and irregularities in the 2020 elections outweigh any allegations in our lifetime,” she added. She even cited a poll that showed 39 percent of Americans believe the election is rigged.

Cruz echoed these arguments in His comments on the ground shortly before the uprising.

Of course, such claims, perceptions, and beliefs flourished in large part because almost no one in Trump’s party would say in the lead-up to January 6 what Cruz ultimately said in his aftermath: It was “reckless” and “irresponsible” for Trump to claim that the election” Stolen everywhere” and that there was “large-scale fraud”. Rather than correct it, his party just made watered-down comments about supposed “irregularities” and government election procedures.

If we were operating as charities, Cruz and his colleagues might have thought this effort was doomed and they didn’t see it.”The downside to petting him in such a short time. They didn’t have to say what Trump was saying. They just wouldn’t contradict him. And soon he was gone.

It turned out to be a fateful decision – fateful for democracy and almost fateful for them personally. And for a while after Jan. 6, Cruz and his fellow Republicans seemed to believe this might be their chance to outpace Trump — or even that they It was to bypass it. They can finally call it what it was.

Then things changed. Kevin McCarthy made a pilgrimage to Mar-a-Lago to atone for his sin of blaming Trump on January 6. And soon, on January 6, the Republicans were making much ado about nothing—until Liz Cheney was fired from the House leadership for daring. To keep pressing the case.

Cruz actually held out longer than some others. For months after January 6, even as some in the conservative movement questioned whether or not it was a rebellion (she was), it has already gone further and He repeatedly described it as a “terrorist” attack.. But then Tucker Carlson called him out. In memory of January 6, Cruz appeared on Carlson’s show for He took his medication and made sure he was no longer calling it a terrorist attack.

And if you want to preview what you’re likely to read about with Cruz voter fraud “evidence,” just take a look at what he said Sunday night.

“If you’re at home talking to people about January 6th, the left uses highly politicized terms like ‘rebellion,’ which is complete political rubbish,” Cruz said. “Anyone who uses that word is engaging in partisan flirting.”

The man who repeatedly described it as a terrorist attack is now censoring other people’s language. And the man who called Trump’s allegations “reckless” and “irresponsible” will now present his own evidence of voter fraud — all, it seems, in the service of ramping up his efforts to contest the results of the 2020 election, including when riots mean.6 (As Cruz said in an interview Sunday) “Some senators have been vacillating.”

It seems unlikely that these allegations will go as far as Trump has. Cruz probably won’t delve into theories about voting machines and Antrim County, Michigan, but the fact that he’s touting his book in these terms says a lot about the GOP’s commitment to appearing like loyal soldiers in that reckless crusade.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *