MetaQuest Pro It is a $1,500 headset that promises to bring productivity to virtual reality, something that has proven difficult due to the limitations of display technology.
This new high-end solution is one of the most famous in the world VR . headset The manufacturer is incorporating two major changes to help with optical clarity, pancake lenses, and a mini LED backlight, but will that be enough to replace your physical screens? Here’s what we know so far.
The Meta Quest Pro hasn’t started shipping to consumers, but some have gotten early previews of the headset. A few lucky developers have been using early development units for some time to prep the apps, and a limited group of tech journalists were given a short time to try out the most expensive Meta headphones as well. In select Best Buy stores, there have been some demo units offered with restricted use, which are mostly limited to mixed reality apps.
These glimpses of what to expect won’t be revealing about work with the Quest Pro shipping next week, and they certainly won’t be as comprehensive as the long-term reviews. However, you do need to know what to expect before paying the $1,500, which can go a long way toward some quality screens.
Joshua Korekicho, Head of Content at Immersed, chirp About his experience with Quest Pro, describing text clarity as amazing and sharing the view from the headset via the smartphone. Korekicho went on to say that he often looked for a dead headset when he needed to use multiple monitors.
Mine #mixedreality 4 screen setting using Tweet embed. 🔥 the #dead #QuestPro The clarity of the text is incredible. Keep in mind that this is through the phone’s camera lens (it doesn’t do it justice). #MetaQuestPro #vr #ar #the master pic.twitter.com/VvgaEsJN9r
And the[مدش]. Joshkori (jkurikeshu) October 17 2022
Andre Elijah is a Creative Director who works for a variety of major companies, including Meta. He’s been using Quest Pro on the road as a virtual monitor and expressed On Twitter, reading the text with this headset is a pleasure.
Reading text on Quest Pro is fun, whether using the Immersed or Guy app. I was using mine as a virtual monitor on the road while my team was developing it.
And the[مدش]. Andre Elijah (@AndreElijah) October 16 2022
Took the Quest Pro as a laptop replacement on my trip to Los Angeles. Turns out the Quest Pro fits the Task 2 carrying case (a little cramped, but it looks good)
And the[مدش]. Noah Rayburn (@FileCorruptGM) October 20 2022
Some journalists who have worked with Quest Pro agree. CNN He said that “even small writing can be easily read.” The Verge wasn’t entirely enthusiastic, describing the screens as impressively clear; However, a small text appeared in Google search “a bit unclear”.
Consumers who have dealt with a Meta Store or Best Buy were impressed by what they saw. Reddit user mount_bar_4823 He said the screen has the best colors and contrast they’ve seen in VR. This is significant, given that they own the Quest 2, HP G2, Valve Index, and Pico 4. They also described the sharpness of the Quest Pro, saying it was as sharp or sharper than the HP G2, which has a resolution of 2160 x 2160 pixels per eye, which is greater than The ones in Quest Pro.
Reddit user Logical 007 They praised the incredibly clear screen that does not require movement of the head for a clear view, even at the edges of the screen.
It’s surprisingly hard to fathom how easy it is to read when the Quest Pro’s per-eye resolution is 1800 x 1920. A 4K screen is known to be better than a 2K screen, so wouldn’t the Quest Pro be half as sharp? We’re so used to looking at screens from a distance that it’s easy to forget we’re talking about a screen just over an inch from your eyes in an enclosure largely shielded from light. This makes a difference.
Quest Pro’s display has been described as clear and easy to read by technology experts. Screen density may be part of the reason this is possible. The iPhone 14 Pro’s screen resolution is just 2556 x 1179 pixels, which equates to 460 pixels per inch, but it’s so densely packed that the pixels are indistinguishable with the naked eye.
The above graph from Meta Display Week 2022 shows where the VR industry stood earlier this year in terms of visual accuracy. Most VR headsets average around 600 pixels per inch (PPI). At 773 pixels per inch (presented in presentation week 2022) the two-year-old Quest 2 in the Meta should appear sharper than the iPhone 14 Pro’s 460 PPI, however, and the screen is much enlarged and rounded to the eye.
If you could focus on your iPhone when it’s within 8cm, which is about 2.5 inches from your eye, it would have the same optical clarity, assuming everything else is the same, which it isn’t. You’ll need a magnifying glass to widen the view to allow you to focus more closely, but it will give you a good idea of how sharp the Quest 2’s screen can be.
The Quest 2’s screen doesn’t look as sharp as it could, because it uses Fresnel lenses, which distort and distort the edges as a magnifying glass does. The Quest Pro is much better, according to Meta, with 37% more pixel density, a 25% improvement in clarity in the center, and 50% better sharpness for the edges thanks to the use of flat lenses. This should add up to a very impressive screen density and clarity. The question is whether that actually holds up. Early reports indicate that he does.
With several large virtual displays that expand the available space, you can increase the text size without the loss you would experience on a laptop. It looks like it might be a perfect multi-screen arrangement on a desk but is portable enough to move from room to room or even on the road. We’ll reserve final judgment until we’ve had enough time with Quest Pro to provide a full review.
The Quest Pro’s color camera, which, by all accounts, is much better than the Quest 2, is still not as crisp and clear as the graphics generated inside the headset. Getting in color is great, but the consensus is that it’s pretty clear you’re looking through the camera, even with great alignment and tracking. It does not matter when displaying text on the screen or connecting the laptop to extend the display to virtual screens.
When using virtual screens, you don’t need to look at your laptop screen or the actual computer screen with the swipe feature. Instead, up to three virtual screens are displayed.
These images appear to be placed a few meters away, but the images are very close to your eye and sharply focused by the pie lenses without any of the smudges, glare from windows, backlighting issues, or off-center dimming you might encounter with a physical screen.
Despite the Quest Pro’s display quality, the main advantage seems to be having more screens when and where you want them without the trouble of setting up two or three large screens. If you do most of your work in one place, it may not be worth the extra expense compared to getting one or two extra displays. Quest Pro is locked at 90Hz and may not fit your needs for fast-paced gaming when compared to a gaming monitor with a high refresh rate.
However, if you like the idea of traveling with a multi-screen device that packs into a small space that’s good for productivity while still offering some compelling VR gaming opportunities, then the Meta Quest Pro could be nearly perfect.
It has good potential as a standalone device, and paired with a laptop might be a way to get the best of both worlds – a three-screen setup that’s also remarkably portable.
We’ll know for sure once we review the headphones ourselves, but for now, these virtual Quest Pro screens look closer to replicating real screens than we thought possible.